Contact us

Sending Email...

Valid input required
Valid input required
Valid input required
Valid input required
Valid input required
Valid input required

Contact person/s

Johanna Vinefur

Johanna Vinefur

Product Manager Compashield

[email protected]

+46 766 956 030

WHITE PAPER

Comparative Study of SMT Grounding Pads — What Impacts Long-Term Reliability?

A technical comparison of two SMT grounding pad designs — conductive silicone and foil-wrapped — and how their construction impacts electrical stability, mechanical durability, and long-term performance in real-world PCB applications.

Key factors that influence SMT grounding pad reliability

Selecting the right SMT grounding pad has a direct impact on PCB performance, EMI/EMC behavior, and long-term reliability — especially in applications exposed to mechanical load, compression, temperature cycling, or humidity. This white paper compares two common grounding pad constructions and highlights how different material and design choices influence electrical contact stability over time.

The summary on this page highlights only high-level insights.

All detailed data, graphs, tables, and failure analysis are available exclusively in the downloadable PDF.

Computer and graphs

This white paper presents a comparative evaluation of two SMT grounding pad designs widely used in PCB applications: a conductive silicone-based SMT pad and a foil-wrapped silicone pad. Both are intended as solderable grounding components that replace traditional metal spring contacts, but their construction differs significantly, resulting in different performance behaviours over time. The study focuses on the key factors that influence grounding pad reliability, including compression response, mechanical durability, electrical resistance, and impedance stability across relevant frequency ranges.

To assess long-term performance, the grounding pads were tested under mechanical compression levels up to 80% and evaluated through accelerated aging conditions such as 1,000 thermal cycles between –40 °C and +125 °C and 1,000 hours at 85 °C / 85% RH. These conditions reveal how material choices, conductive mechanisms, and structural design influence the pads’ ability to maintain consistent electrical contact over time. Differences in durability, deformation resistance and contact integrity become especially visible under combined environmental and mechanical stress.

The findings highlight how grounding pads that appear similar in initial specifications can diverge significantly in performance when exposed to real-world conditions. Understanding how conduction paths, material interfaces, and design geometries behave under stress is essential for selecting reliable grounding components for advanced electronics.

This white paper provides engineers, PCB designers, EMC/EMI specialists and reliability teams with key insights to support informed decision-making when evaluating grounding pad technologies for long-term robust performance.

 

What the study examines

  • How conductive mechanisms differ between silicone-based and foil-wrapped pads
  • Why initial low resistance may not translate to long-term stability
  • How pads behave under compression levels up to 80%
  • What aging tests reveal about structural integrity
  • When and why certain pads lose electrical contact after stress exposure

(Detailed graphs, measurements, tables, and microscopy images are available only in the downloadable report.)

 

Who should download this report

  • Electronics design engineers
  • PCB and grounding specialists
  • EMC/EMI engineers
  • Reliability and quality teams
  • Technical decision-makers in ruggedized electronics
 

Why this matters

Grounding pads that look similar on paper can behave very differently in real life when exposed to compression, vibration, temperature cycling and high humidity. The right design can significantly reduce the risk of:

  • Loss of electrical contact over time
  • Mechanical deformation and damage to foil layers
  • Increased impedance after aging
  • Field failures and costly warranty issues

This report helps you make informed design and sourcing decisions based on real test data – not assumptions.

 
FAQ

What affects the long-term reliability of SMT grounding pads?

Factors such as compression behavior, material construction, conductive mechanism, and environmental exposure all influence long-term stability. The report explains how and why these factors matter in more detail.

What is the difference between conductive silicone and foil-wrapped SMT pads?

They rely on different conductive principles and structural designs, which can lead to different behaviors over time. The detailed comparison between the two approaches is presented in the full study.

How do SMT grounding pads behave under compression?

Compression affects both electrical and mechanical performance, but the extent varies by construction. The white paper includes full resistance-versus-compression curves and analysis for the designs evaluated.

What happens during aging tests such as thermal cycling and humidity exposure?

Thermal and humidity aging tests highlight how different pad designs endure stress over time. The specific performance outcomes and visual observations are included only in the downloadable report.

Why compare grounding pad designs at all?

Pads that appear similar at first can perform very differently in demanding environments. This white paper clarifies the key considerations for engineers when selecting SMT grounding pads for long-term reliability.

By downloading the report, you will get access to:

  • Electrical resistance vs. compression curves
  • Impedance measurements up to 6 GHz
  • Results after 1,000 thermal cycles (−40 °C to 125 °C) and 1,000 hours at 85 °C / 85% RH
  • High-resolution microscopy and visual inspection images
  • Full descriptions of test setups and measurement methods
 

You might also be interested in